Speech difficulties at the moment of socialize

blogger

† † †
Blog del trabajo de Introducción a la Lingüística.
Universidad: Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León
Facultad: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras
Colegio: Ciencias del Lenguaje
Fecha: 26 de Noviembre
Tema: Speech difficulties at the moment of socialize

Evelyn Guadalupe Solis Castillo1579247
Carolina Genoveva Hernandez 1585166

References

The study of pidgin and creole lenguages by Pierer Muysken and Norval Smith
Pidgin and Creoles by Genivieve Escure
El concepto de cultura

Lenguaje según Chomsky
Hipotesis Sapir-Whorf
Linguistica, Politica y Responsabilidad por Chomsky Noam

Surveys

.

Here.

Introduction

archives

credits

Final Conclusions

posted on miércoles, 26 de noviembre de 2014 at 9:38

Conclusions

According to the results we got from the surveys and also the found information, we would say that an 80 % is strongly related to the impression given by a person by their forms of expression. While the first thing we noticed is the physical appearance, the way we express ourselves is paramount, depending on that we, wrongly, classify and judge the person. Society is used to catalog people, and by their way of expressing their thoughts is one of the key factors. Despite this, is there some tolerance trait?

A majority of the respondents expressed that bad words, was something they did not fancy to hear often. However, there is some prejudice, that a person who does not speak too well, curse, or do not have a good use of words has not had a proper education or environment has not been the best and not only the environment, also of the situation. The way of perceiving culture has a close relationship with speech and this can greatly influence whether differences in a level that exceeds the tolerance of cordiality are presented.

We were expecting the pidgin was one of the sharpest problems but was never anything more than some mention that allowed them to classify and not something that would cause discomfort in people who were not accustomed to this style of speech. It could be endured, but always exist that distance to expressions that people is not familiar with. On the other hand, if this became something that did not achieve overcome by the group, the dominant side so to speak, participants obviated that had to change the style or form of expression through speech to fit and adapt in a better way. So then, from a linguistic point of view, one dialect is neither better nor worse than another, it is simply different.